Macimorelin is among the best-evidenced agents in this atlas for its specific use: a validation study, an FDA-pivotal randomized crossover against the gold-standard insulin tolerance test, documented reproducibility, and guideline/HTA recognition. The pediatric program is the honest counterweight — a phase-2 success but a phase-3 trial that missed its primary endpoint, keeping pediatric use investigational.
APivotal RCT · vs ITT
Garcia et al. 2018 — macimorelin as a diagnostic test for adult GHD
Multicenter, open-label, randomized two-way crossover validating single-dose oral macimorelin against the insulin tolerance test in adults across low/intermediate/high GHD likelihood plus matched controls. At the 2.8/5.1 ng/mL cutoffs, negative agreement was 95.4% and positive agreement 74.3%; reproducibility ~97%; no serious adverse events for macimorelin.
BValidation · vs GHRH-arginine
Garcia et al. 2013 — AEZS-130 oral GH-stimulation validation
Open-label study comparing oral macimorelin with GHRH+arginine in AGHD patients and controls; ROC analysis gave an optimal GH cut point of 2.7 ng/mL (82% sensitivity, 92% specificity), with discrimination comparable to GHRH+arginine and a single asymptomatic QT prolongation as the only drug-related serious event.
ARegulatory · FDA label
Macrilen (macimorelin) FDA prescribing information
Approved label defining the 0.5 mg/kg fasting oral protocol, 30/45/60/90-min GH sampling, the 2.8 ng/mL cutoff, reconstitution to 0.5 mg/mL, QTc warning, CYP3A4-inducer and GH-axis interactions, the BMI > 40 limitation, and the pediatric/geriatric/pregnancy data gaps.
CPediatric · phase 2
Chaychenko et al. 2022 — macimorelin PK/PD in children
Open-label dose-escalation trial (n=24, ages ~4–15) testing 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg with good safety/tolerability and dose-proportional PK; GH rose after dosing with the highest dose most discriminating — supporting a 1.0 mg/kg design for the pediatric phase-3 trial.
CPediatric · phase 3 (2024)
DETECT trial 2024 — childhood-onset GHD diagnosis
Phase-3 trial (n=102, ages 3–17) reporting potent GH release and confirmed pediatric safety, but the primary endpoint was not met per protocol; the adjudicated "optimal" cutoff (~25.6 ng/mL) sat far above standard pediatric thresholds, with surprising discordances under further analysis — keeping pediatric use investigational.
BPost-hoc · subgroup robustness
NICE MIB320 2023 — macimorelin evidence review
Health-technology review summarizing the pivotal trial and a post-hoc analysis showing test performance (AUROC ≈ 0.99) was not meaningfully affected by age, BMI, or sex, with sensitivity ~88% and specificity ~97% at the 2.8 ng/mL cutoff.
BReview · GHD testing
Diagnosis of GH deficiency across the ages (2023)
Endocrine Connections review placing macimorelin among GH-stimulation tests: attractive for being oral, reproducible, safe, and comparable in accuracy to ITT and GHRH+arginine, while noting barriers of cost, access, drug interactions, and limited data in children and patients > 70.
AGuideline · AGHD
Endocrine Society — evaluation & treatment of adult GHD
Clinical practice guidance emphasizing that adult GHD diagnosis requires biochemical confirmation with a GH-stimulation test in the right clinical context (structural pituitary disease, surgery/radiation, multiple pituitary deficiencies, TBI), not symptoms alone — the framework macimorelin testing serves.
BDatabase · molecular identity
PubChem / DrugBank — macimorelin identity
Chemical records for the free base (C₂₆H₃₀N₆O₃, MW 474.55, CAS 381231-18-1, CID 9804938) and the acetate salt (C₂₈H₃₄N₆O₅, MW 534.6), confirming the Aib-D-Trp-D-gTrp-CHO pseudotripeptide, ghrelin-receptor agonist class, ~4.1 h half-life, and CYP3A4 metabolism.
AReference standard · ITT
Insulin tolerance test — the comparator macimorelin was built against
The ITT remains the reference GH-stimulation test, with sensitivity ~96% and specificity ~92%, but it deliberately induces hypoglycemia and is contraindicated in coronary artery disease, seizure disorders, and the elderly. These limitations are precisely what an oral alternative like macimorelin addresses, and why test-failure rates differ so sharply between the two.
PMechanism · GHS-R1a signaling
The ghrelin-receptor arm of GH secretion
GHS-R1a is a class-A GPCR signaling through Gq/11–phospholipase C–IP₃/DAG–Ca²⁺/PKC with notable constitutive activity. Macimorelin engages this ghrelin arm — mechanistically distinct from the GHRH-receptor (Gs/cAMP) arm used by sermorelin-type analogs — which is why the two secretagogue classes can be used to interrogate GH reserve from different angles.
ALabel · PK / food effect
Food effect & the fasting requirement
The label's clinical-pharmacology data show a liquid meal reduced macimorelin Cmax by 55% and AUC by 49%, with GH peaking 30–90 minutes post-dose. This exposure sensitivity is the quantitative basis for the ≥8-hour fasting rule and a reminder that protocol deviations directly threaten test validity.
ALabel · reproducibility
Test–retest reproducibility
Reproducibility is a core attribute of a diagnostic: repeat macimorelin testing agreed with the first test in ~97% of retested subjects (and ~91% in the label's 34-subject repeatability set), supporting confidence that a single oral protocol yields stable results across occasions.
BComparator landscape
Glucagon & GHRH-arginine stimulation tests
Where the ITT is unsuitable, the glucagon stimulation test is an option but is long, nausea-prone, and BMI/cutoff-sensitive. Glucagon serves as an ITT alternative with these practical drawbacks, while GHRH+arginine is historically accurate but constrained by limited GHRH availability in markets such as the US — the access gap macimorelin was designed to fill.
DRegulatory · development history
From AEZS-130 to Macrilen / Ghryvelin
Developed by Aeterna Zentaris (as AEZS-130 / JMV-1843), macimorelin received FDA approval in December 2017. It is marketed as Macrilen in the US, South Korea, and Israel and as Ghryvelin in the European Economic Area, with the developer now operating as COSCIENS Biopharma — useful provenance for sourcing and label-version tracking.
DDatabase · salt & formulation
Free base vs acetate — getting the chemistry right
A common cataloguing error is conflating the salt and free base. The acetate (C₂₈H₃₄N₆O₅, ~534.6, CAS 945212-59-9) is the formulated salt — 60 mg base ≈ 68 mg acetate per pouch, while the free base (C₂₆H₃₀N₆O₃, 474.55) is the active moiety the dose is expressed in. The page's identity card states both explicitly.